Fix typo: considering to consider in scaling AWS solution (#109)
parent
98cf88efea
commit
eb318fad5c
|
@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ As the service continues to grow towards the figures outlined in the constraints
|
|||
|
||||
We'll continue to address scaling issues due to the problem's constraints:
|
||||
|
||||
* If our **MySQL Database** starts to grow too large, we might considering only storing a limited time period of data in the database, while storing the rest in a data warehouse such as Redshift
|
||||
* If our **MySQL Database** starts to grow too large, we might consider only storing a limited time period of data in the database, while storing the rest in a data warehouse such as Redshift
|
||||
* A data warehouse such as Redshift can comfortably handle the constraint of 1 TB of new content per month
|
||||
* With 40,000 average read requests per second, read traffic for popular content can be addressed by scaling the **Memory Cache**, which is also useful for handling the unevenly distributed traffic and traffic spikes
|
||||
* The **SQL Read Replicas** might have trouble handling the cache misses, we'll probably need to employ additional SQL scaling patterns
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue