feat: add cache write-behind disadvantage
parent
a07e261677
commit
52c460eaeb
|
@ -1268,8 +1268,9 @@ Write-through is a slow overall operation due to the write operation, but subseq
|
|||
|
||||
##### Disadvantage(s): write through
|
||||
|
||||
* When a new node is created due to failure or scaling, the new node will not cache entries until the entry is updated in the database. Cache-aside in conjunction with write through can mitigate this issue.
|
||||
* When a new node is created due to failure or scaling, the new node will not cache entries until the entry is updated in the database. Cache-aside in conjunction with write through can mitigate this issue.
|
||||
* Most data written might never be read, which can be minimized with a TTL.
|
||||
* Failure in "Store in the DB" may lead to cache storing data that was never committed to the database. For a strong consistency, it's necessary to update the cache and the database in a distributed transaciton that will roll back the cache in case of database failure. This adds complexity to the system.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Write-behind (write-back)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue